The Subtle Menace: Natural Catastrophes and Neglected Oncology Treatment

Advertise With Us – Reach the Crypto Crowd

Promote your blockchain project, token, or service to a dedicated and growing crypto audience.

Like other realms of public health, natural calamities pose a more systemic threat beyond their physical devastation. Other than contracting dangerous diseases, sufferers are also losing the ability to get diagnosed for cancer, which spells trouble for them and the world. As the phrase above suggests, the analysis in question wants us to focus on the gap of healthcare sufficiency and its dreadful sequelae of impaired diagnosis, invasive disease processes, and mortality.

Puerto Rico in Focus: The Twin Hurricanes and COVID-19 Quarantine Effects

Ireland-based researchers carried out a study assessing the effects of Irma and Maria’s dual impact alongside Puerto Rican COVID-19 lockdowns on colorectal cancer (CRC) case ascertainment. For trend analysis, inquiries were made in the Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, an all-encompassing cancer registry that has been active since 1950 and captures all cancer diagnosed and treated within Puerto Rico.

The figures indicate a stunning decline in new diagnoses.

The evaluation uncovered a significant and troubling pattern. The research discovered that CRC’s first-time diagnoses between 2012 and 2021 stood at 18,537 residents. The hurricanes’ onset month saw 161.4 expected CRC diagnoses under normal circumstances. However, actual diagnoses plummeted to 82, an extremely concerning figure that encapsulates the impact of these disasters on healthcare services.

The Sound of Silence: The Echo Chamber of COVID-19 2.0

A period of slight increase was preceded by an initial decrease in diagnoses, only to be followed by the most serious drop to date, post-COVID-19 lockdowns. In April 2020, observed CRC cases were 50, significantly lower than the pre-disaster expectation of 162.5. The severity and long-standing consequences of public health emergencies on cancer treatment are striking.

“Stage of Diagnosis Shift: A Grave Risk”

The study’s most concerning impact was the change in CRC diagnosis relative to stage. At the study’s conclusion, there was an increase in patients with late-stage CRC and a decrease in early-stage CRC patients, all within the expected age for screening (50-75 years). On the contrary, early-stage patients were outside the mid-range of expected services (both < 50 years and > 76 years). This observation supports a culminating hypothesis that a misalignment of expectable early-stage patients being diagnosed in conjunction with disruptive health care and disasters led to postponements in diagnosis, revealing significantly more advanced cancers.

Expert Commentary: A Graver Risk

Insight from the study was described by co-lead author Dr. Jesús F. García-Gavilán: “As people age, especially women after menopause, BMD [bone mineral density] tends to decline, increasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, which significantly impacts quality of life and independent living,” García-Gavilán noted. Outlining the “need for actionable sustainable solutions targeting effective strategies to maintain BMD” was heavily stressed by the author in light of estimating negative consequences outlined in preceding remarks.

A Global Warning: The Consequences Go Further Than Puerto Rico

Although this study emphasized Puerto Rico, its findings are more far-reaching. The weakness of cancer care during disasters is a universal problem. The healthcare ecosystem, which is disrupted by natural calamities, pandemics, or wars, is inordinately detrimental to cancer patients, as they may face postponed diagnoses, treatment interruptions, and increased death rates.

A Call for Preparedness: Building Sustainable Healthcare

This study makes a strong argument about the ability of healthcare systems to respond and adapt to abrupt, drastic changes, which is traditionally focused on disaster-relief preparedness. This encompasses creating reliable access frameworks to critical services in emergencies or cancer care provision during the most trying times. Effective infrastructure, Canadian investment in healthcare, and the public health response to emergencies and the healthcare needs of vulnerable groups are underprepared when responding to the differentiated aftereffects of emergency disasters.

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This article is sponsored content. Kryptonary does not verify or endorse the claims, statistics, or information provided. Cryptocurrency investments are speculative and highly risky; you should be prepared to lose all invested capital. Kryptonary does not perform due diligence on featured projects and disclaims all liability for any investment decisions made based on this content. Readers are strongly advised to conduct their own independent research and understand the inherent risks of cryptocurrency investments.

Share this article