Hyperliquid Whales Net $48M on XPL Rally Amid Manipulation Allegations

XPL’s Explosive 200% Rally Raises Eyebrows

The Plasma blockchain’s native token, XPL, surged 200% to $1.80 within minutes on Hyperliquid. The sudden move created massive profits for a handful of whales while wiping out other traders. Four whale addresses reportedly orchestrated the rally, generating nearly $48 million in gains.

Such abrupt moves highlight both the opportunities and risks of decentralized platforms. While big profits are celebrated by winners, accusations of manipulation cast doubt on Hyperliquid’s reliability. Market participants are increasingly questioning whether DEXs can maintain fair conditions when whales hold so much influence.

Four Whales Reap $47.5 Million in Profits

Blockchain data revealed four whale wallets collectively gained $47.5 million from the rally. One address, labeled 0xb9c, was identified as the largest player, netting more than $15 million alone. Analysts described this wallet as the “main orchestrator” of the sudden surge.

Other whales capitalized in similar fashion, each leveraging Hyperliquid’s structure to maximize their gains. This coordinated activity has led to suspicions that the XPL rally was less organic than it appeared. Traders are now debating whether such events undermine the transparency promised by decentralized exchanges.

Retail Traders Bear the Brunt of Losses

Not everyone walked away with profits. At least two traders disclosed multimillion-dollar losses following the rally. One reported losing $4.5 million after their position was liquidated. Another, an X user named CBB, admitted to losing $2.5 million on a short position and vowed to avoid isolated markets moving forward.

These examples highlight the risks smaller traders face when whales dominate liquidity. Extreme volatility often redistributes wealth from retail investors to larger players, undermining trust in decentralized platforms. The fallout from this event has amplified calls for better safeguards.

Allegations of Manipulation Resurface for Hyperliquid

This isn’t the first time Hyperliquid has faced criticism over alleged manipulation. Just five months earlier, the platform suffered a $6.26 million exploit involving the Jelly my Jelly (JELLY) token due to liquidation vulnerabilities. Critics argue that the XPL event shows Hyperliquid has not yet resolved its systemic issues.

Spot On Chain, a blockchain analytics platform, described the latest incident as “one of the wildest short squeezes and wealth redistributions we’ve seen.” They called for Hyperliquid to address weaknesses that enable whales to exploit markets so easily.

Recommended Article: Hyperliquid Challenges Binance as Derivatives Volume Ratio Climbs to 14%

Initially, one blockchain sleuth suggested that Tron founder Justin Sun might be behind one of the whale wallets. However, this claim was later withdrawn. The analyst publicly apologized, clarifying that their early assessment was incorrect and that further details would be released later.

Despite the retraction, speculation about whale identities continues to swirl. The wallet in question reportedly cleared the entire XPL order book before closing positions worth $16 million in just one minute. Its remaining open trades suggest the whale is still heavily invested in XPL.

The Broader Impact on Decentralized Exchanges

Events like this raise larger questions about the future of decentralized trading. While DEXs promise fairness and transparency, repeated cases of manipulation cast shadows over their credibility. For smaller investors, the perception that markets are stacked in favor of whales could deter participation.

At the same time, these incidents highlight the need for more robust risk management systems. Without stronger safeguards, Hyperliquid and other DEXs risk losing the trust of the broader crypto community. Balancing openness with protection against abuse remains a critical challenge.

Trust Tested by Whale Games

The $48 million profit scored by Hyperliquid whales underscores the double-edged nature of decentralized trading. For some, it was a windfall; for others, a devastating loss. With accusations of manipulation resurfacing, Hyperliquid faces mounting pressure to prove its markets are fair and resilient.

As decentralized finance continues to evolve, the lesson is clear: without meaningful safeguards, whales will continue to dominate, leaving retail traders vulnerable. How platforms respond will shape whether DeFi can truly live up to its promise of transparency and equality.

IMPORTANT NOTICE

This article is sponsored content. Kryptonary does not verify or endorse the claims, statistics, or information provided. Cryptocurrency investments are speculative and highly risky; you should be prepared to lose all invested capital. Kryptonary does not perform due diligence on featured projects and disclaims all liability for any investment decisions made based on this content. Readers are strongly advised to conduct their own independent research and understand the inherent risks of cryptocurrency investments.

Share this article